Steam Trains From Great Britain and Beyond

Communism – an analysis

PREFACE

It is a thought provoking and deep dimensional analysis. Therefore, it is related Boggle the mind of the person who asked the question, and who dares to answer it! This should have been analyzed and responded to the 17th or 18th century. Then everyone should have worked in an entirely different political and social infrastructure? I think it's worth having this in the archives of the 21st century bibliographic collections, helping many developing and under developed countries (who are "still" have faith solid in the old "communism), to formulate an appropriate strategy to" Accelerate the pace of their socio-economic development .

A survival) and The Family Tree

Charles Darwin (1809-1882), British naturalist, revolutionized science of biology by his demonstration of "evolution by natural selection." In the 19th century, he reflects on the survival and extinction biological species. He said "Survival of the Fittest" enthroned alone any kind of grow and continue to survive in any infrastructure and geographical environment in the world. (Note: He did not say "survival of the biggest, fastest healthy, Mightiest, the smartest or more difficult ", etc.."). It concludes that the organization that best "fits" into its environment, sets up with suffering, adjusts and continues to progress, had the best chance of survival in the world.

humans are very much a part of this concept of survival on earth. But human beings are provided with an additional attribute of intelligence. Consequently, they acquired an additional "economic" and "dimension social survival. "This adds to the natural environment and the physical extent, in common with all other species.

All human beings, so try to fit into a 3-dimensional concept: the survival (a) of the geography and the environment (b) social status and (c) economic infrastructure.

Within these frameworks, all species in the world to build and protect their pedigree (Tree) to grow and prosper over the centuries

B) lower socio-economic

Generation of man during the past millennium, many of goal, has worked and equipped in the mixture of certain saturation level socio-economic development.

1) To obtain basic needs only (food, shelter and clothing) for the day to day survival. (Category-C. Decreased survival effort economic)

2) acquire, store and collect basic needs for a limited future. (Category – B1. Less effort economic survival).

c) Enhance the comfort in acquiring the luxury needs, in addition to basic needs (Category – B Medium effort economic survival).

Only some people apply the "extra" economic and social concepts of "intelligence" and "risk taking", certain economic and acquisitions has intensified social as below –

d) To invent new ideas, gadgets, motivational techniques social and technical processes, to achieve a "man of leadership" in the world. All actors, politicians, scientists, sports etc. … belong this group.

(Category – A1. Higher social + economic survival).

e) Take risks sacrificing the gains and stored in richness (b) and (c) above, to an "economic leadership." The businessmen, gamblers, investors, producers (entertainment, Products or processes), etc. Traders. format of this group of people. (Category – a. the highest economic survival with company executives as a by-product).

Inference – The wealth and economic prosperity of an individual is directly proportional to their objects and their efforts, rated C, B1, B, A1, A above

Note – The basic human tendency is to never share the wealth of self with others, but the share of the wealth of others as much as possible for individuals in all classifications above C, B1, B, A1, A!

C) capitalism – DIVIDER WEALTH

generation of human the Stone Age, analyzed their continued independent existence, and groups formed. These developed into societies. Basic needs these companies were food, shelter and clothing. subgroups of members of the company decided to work exclusively for each need for agricultural products and food, clothing cotton based clothing and earth structures of wood / shelter. This included the construction of wooden carts pulled by oxen or horses for transportation. All these materials and the animals were under the superiority of man, the master behind them. In this context the ancient world, there was no significant change in wealth or "economic wealth" among people.

The industrial revolution was responsible for creating a gap between the eternal unity between man and materials / animals. From 1563 with the Rev. William Lee, born at Woodborough (near Nottingham, England) invented the Stocking Frame, a mechanical device for knitting stockings, to 1801, when Robert Trevithick (Cornwall, England) demonstrated a steam Locomotive. Then, the productive work of brain + human groups have been Supported by mechanical machines. (Subsequent to the accelerated pace Inventions are classified as scientific research and development)

Machines produced the goods needed for + higher basic human needs in large quantities, better quality and lower costs.

In 1800, when machines became superior to human beings who can take risks and acquire the machines (which needed a substantial investment) became the capitalist risk taking (Category – A).

They felt that the unskilled labor-capitalist spirit as a commodity, and began hiring and firing them. Using the improved machine productivity, they receive a salary much less for operators supervisors and human machines, to turn over a large volume of products at a higher price per unit advantageously, due to the reduction costs.

This has created more people to search only for basic needs, with limited power to consider other higher needs and zero risk taking capacity (Class B and C). Capitalism has divided the reason for the possession of wealth among the people. However, due to competition, capitalists felt the need for active participation in the management of vocational training, and incentives for the labor market. It diluted capitalism with a share of more wealth between justifiable work, and ended in a concept of "socialism".

However, capitalism has become a rule of the world in the early 1880s, making the rich richer, the poor get poorer. He launched a capitalist (A) in relation to work (C) fight between a few rich and the poor large groups. This environment makes some personalities polotico-economic thinking and quickly find a solution to control and eradicate the culture of "capitalist" trend.

D) ACQUISITION OF WEALTH – BIRTH OF COMMUNISM

If a mental body and come to think of many people in the world belonging to the above categories A, A1, B1, B and C, arithmetically and logically, the conclusion must be as below: –

A = Very little. A1 = low. B1 = Some.

B = C = A lot of very large

This provides a guideline to answer the question "Why a large quantum of wealth is possessed by very few people at one end, and why people are very large poor at the other end, in this world economy !!!!". That is the question the foundation on which communism behind and survived worldwide.

INFERENCE # 1 – The acquisition of wealth is directly proportional to the risk "by taking" the ability and partially proportional the usefulness of "intelligence".

INFERENCE # 2 acquisition of luxury – crossing the boundary of the acquisition needs base is directly proportional to a wrap around and medium level of economic wealth (all white collar and management professionals in the world – class average in the category B).

INFERENCE # 3 – Limited economic survival thinking, and the direction towards the first one day to the economy need is directly proportional to a wrap around the situation of poor economic wealth. [More than 70% of the population in the world are poor (B1) and below the poverty line (C)]

In 1897, an engineer born in Paris on behalf Vilfredo Pareto showed that the distribution of wealth in Europe followed a simple power law model, which essentially means that the rich monopolized most of the wealth of a nation (New Scientist, August 19, 2000, p 22). Economists realized later that this law applies to all the very rich, and not necessarily to how wealth is distributed among the rest. But mathematically, a Pareto distribution has often been used to quantify the distribution of wealth in the world, it is called an analysis "ABC" or a power law (a polynomial relationship – a phrase that is constructed from one or more variables and constants, using only the operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and constant positive whole number exponents). It has the property that the probability distribution which coincides with social, scientific, geophysical, and many other types of observable phenomena.

It is well known that wealth is distributed unequally and unfairly. People on all the attributes of a normal distribution, talent and motivation, but it ends with distribution of wealth unequal, disproportionate to the real talents of the population

LESSON: EQ heritage is a marathon task in the world. This is because every human being has a unique level of saturation in the socioeconomic strata between A and C. Very little objective to A. But most have stagnated level B or C.

E) communism – EQ WEALTH

Karl Heinrich Marx (May 5, 1818 – March 14, 1883), a German philosopher, economist and revolutionary has been a pioneer in the struggle against the dominant role of capitalism in the 1880s the world.

Marx addressed a wide range of issues. He best known for his analysis of history, summarized in the first line of the introduction of the Communist Manifesto (1848) that "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Marx believed that capitalism would be replaced by communism, over a period time, by popular revolution.

Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, better known under the pseudonym "Lenin" (April 22, 1870 to January 21, 1924), was a Russian revolutionary, a communist politician, the leader and the first head of the Soviet Union (USSR). Lenin introduced Communism in Russia. It changed the history of Russia and the rest of Europe. Lenin applied the ideas of Marxism in Europe and Russia, a threat to Europe and the rest of the world. In developing its plan of socialism in Russia, Lenin followed the examples of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels [November 28, 1820 - August 5, 1895, a scientist 19th century German social philosopher, developed communist theory alongside his better-known collaborator, Karl Marx, co-author of "The Communist Manifesto (1848), "and the original developers of the] communist theory. Lenin explained in his economic theory, called" imperialism " The first step was to move gradually into a monopoly joined the capitalist phase, which later became communism. He estimated that the monopoly and capitalism are complete opposites to each other, and should cause problems for the survival of human beings.

F) approach COMMUNIST

Both Marx and Lenin were revolutionary social leaders "and composed of leadership" economic " theory under the assumption that a large quantity of human beings in the lower economic strata (B, B1 and C) will revolt share the wealth of some in the upper economic (A and A1). It was like "water is at its level" when poured into a large reservoir.

The other European politico-economists like Marx and Lenin, thought in similar formats. It leads to the formation Communist dominated "East Germany (GDR)" by building the great wall of Berlin August 13, 1961, and the formation of the world's largest Communist empire, the USSR – Union of Soviet Socialist Republics "in 1922 with Russia + other 14 Communist countries in Europe as spirit and North Asia.

But communism centralized all of the national wealth with the state "in the apex, so that any person who does not possess wealth. At the same time all individuals have all the national wealth aggregated at the state level. The state control and curb all those below, to take any type of risk, or to use their brain to innovate or to have a say in the use of wealth at the top level of the state. In this context the only wealth is the state (A) and all the people below were salaried workers (C), but protected by the state to meet all their basic needs. This heated desire in the people of individual freedom and we urge improve their economic and social self.

Marx and Lenin assumed that the large amount of people in the lower economic and Social will revolt and achieve a level of wealth equal satisfaction as "the water is at its level" when poured into a large reservoir. But what happened is that the people revolted to have the freedom to decide their own economic and social strata, leaving the reservoir (State), holding them tight. Therefore, communism crashed worldwide in 1991.

* The Communist Germany in the eastern part fell in their socio-economic set up, broke the wall, November 9, 1989, and merged with West Germany capitalist.

* USSR fell apart several small nations (and officially dissolved 31 December 1991), each diluting their Communist principles (full State control), to private enterprise, as well as associations and collaborations with capitalism dominated western United States.

G) why communism failed?

It is an economic issue millions of dollars! The reasons are deferred from assumptions behind the methodology applied and the direction of survival of the population.

a) The initiators of Communism in the world, both Marx and Lenin have been revolutionary or "executives". All social leader in the world lacks "thoughts Management futurists ". They were ambitious to share and to equalize wealth among all peoples. But they never thought that way whose common wealth could be put into production department, creating a surplus and recycled to grow more and more.

b) Both Germany East and the USSR together all the assets of their nation and have their "state" as the sole owner. Therefore, he helped the State to develop as a monopoly and all the people the simplest work, without self possessions.

The state has used the work as a commodity, without no incentive to use their original ideas and any incentive to improve productivity spirit of contribution.

c) In their turn, have created the disappointment and frustration in the mind of a caseload of major groups spread across the country. The State has met the physical needs and basic needs (food, shelter and clothing). But he failed to respond to economic and social needs more rooted in the mind of man. Nobody can have an economic surplus funds or be a leader of local groups. These contrary to the belief of Marx and Lenin, economic demand and needs of human social freedom revolted against the state and the "care takers" of the state.

It took end the era of 69 years (1922 to 1991) of Communist domination in the world. Because the communist principles were applied with an emphasis on guidance STATE and not with the direction PEOPLE.

H) How communism could have flowered?

It is also a question of one million Euro! If Communism was a little futuristic key management, he could emerge as international guidelines for human survival, prosperity and peace.

1) The Communist countries, should not have pooled all the wealth of the nation, she told the state to be managed by their care takers elected. This has created a monopoly weight of the head in the apex.

2) The state and elected leaders should not Having reviewed all the national public as a job, without any role to play in the management and operation of national wealth, pooled at the top.

3) The methodology used for the survival of communism, was to "consider the national population and economic development / aspirations social survival "as superior to the head" orientation massive state '. Without diluting the concept of equal sharing of wealth, approach would be: –

a) Form groups holds National ranging from 1,000 to a maximum of 10,000, manage and progress preassigned rich segments of the pool.

Example.

* Cultivated land in 1000 Pool small plots. Allot is the inner ear to a group of 1,000 people agricultural expert, to work, grow, produce crops scored in each season, sell, export revenues and deposit at the Central Bank. (Agriculture to help get a mass high-volume production at reduced cost). The central treasury should provide all necessary equipment the head of expenditure, etc.. on justified and supported requests by members of the group. A Quantum sales target must also be set.

Automotive plants * Build words with an investment of 1 million each national currency. Allot each unit to a national group of 5,000 experts working in the auto, manufacturing, assemble, test, sell / export and deposit the revenues of the central bank. The central treasury should provide all necessary equipment, head on expenses etc.. on justified and supported requests by members of the group. A Quantum sales target must also be set

* Va even for the aerospace, hospital chemicals, transportation, textile etc. … industries. The whole population should be members some working groups and nobody should be unemployed.

b) The state should take care of housing, food, clothing, children's education, recreation, health care etc. … for all members in groups.

c) The central bank should pay a fixed salary to all members of the group, regardless of the type of membership in a group (agricultural, industrial, health, etc..). An amount of adjustment could be given to certain groups justified the location and other criteria acceptable exception.

d) The sector groups that have not reached the target amount of sale should be questioned, the reasons must be analyzed, and actions should be taken by setting achievable goals and cons because production must be eradicated.

e) An amount due of total net surplus (or profits – Losses) while the group works each year, must be retained by the central bank for new investment development activities, The balance is divided equally among group members in all sectors, as an incentive.

f) If the total net loss, in a year, it should be Bourne by the central bank, analyzed the right sector, and corrective action must be taken to the event not of the same next year.

The communist principles must be applied with emphasis on primary and secondary orientation PEOPLE that the orientation STATE

g) In addition, the concept of productivity should be directed to "The socio-economic development (SED)" exit as a tool Main evaluation of "Quantum" measures. Accordingly, the decision of the management "method should also be listening.

h) Socio-economic drive accelerated development must come from within a nation than as a command / motivation outside. This is possible if the investments "are internal domestic savings (albeit with a foreign aid to begin with) and "domestic technology" (technology based moderate domestic conditions) should be held through labor "domestic"

See the book "Sed by DRVSRS" and "DRVSRS by SOMA (SOMA = Social Management) at http://www.lulu.com/drvsrs

I) CONTENTS

a) the production of man trying to fit into a 3 dimensional survival concept including environment / Geography, economic and social dimensions, over the centuries and their progress pedigree. under these guidelines.

b) Because the level of objectives competing for survival in the economic and social strata of every human being the accumulation of wealth flows unevenly between individuals.

c) The industrial revolution mechanized human labor, cost reduction and quality / volume optimization. This planted capitalism worldwide, has created a gap in the process of wealth accumulation. This even inducted a class war. between the owners of wealth from workers, hired and fired by them. Competition is the capitalist to realize the importance of work and to dilute the concept of "socialism".

d) The disproportionate wealth accumulation in the seeds of the concept of communism in the world.

e) the original Marx Communism in Germany, spread to Russia and has been promoted by Lenin. The two took the high volume of people in the world belong to the category with low wealth workers. By Accordingly, they revolted to equal sharing of wealth and communism must dominate the world soon.

f) But Marx and Lenin were "social revolutionary" and lacked "futuristic management thoughts" on how the wealth will be shared recycled to grow more and more and the result of prosperity to the people equally? That thought ended, the USSR (1922) and East Germany (GDR-1961) and were created, with all the wealth of the nation gathered on the summit "state", representing entire population!

g) The State has become a monopoly and all the people were simple workers, not his property himself. The state has used labor as a commodity, without any motivation to use their original ideas and any incentive to improve the productive contribution spirit. As aresult, the GDR collapsed in 1989 and the Soviet Union fell in 1991, ending 69 years old communist concept. Beyond that, the two started promote diametrically opposed capitalist approach and the cooperation established with the imperialists () U.S.. (Because of the orientation State was the main and popular orientation was secondary).

h) Communism could have survived and continued as a guide to wealth and prosperity for all nations in the world, if the local population was considered "superior" to "state". The national wealth owned by the state "should have been invested in sectoral projects and entrusted to Optimum Group of people to work, manage and respond to a targeted sales. State met all the needs of these groups of people. A reasonable share of net earnings should have been distributed equally to all, as an incentive. Below are the objectives and the loss would have been questioned and corrective action should have been taken. . (People should be primary focus and direction of state should be secondary).

In addition, productivity Decision management and should be oriented towards socio-economic development units. "Domestic investments should be made from domestic savings and domestic technology must be employed in domestic work

J) REFERENCES

All the question is created and presented by the original thought, know-how, innovative ideas, research and development orientation of DR.VSRS, with the support of: –

1. http://www.drvsrs.com/polifina.htm

2. http://www.drvsrs.com/sedfull.htm

3. http://www.drvsrs.com/mgmtfull.htm

DR.VSRS

Book Store – http://www.lulu.com/drvsrs

Website – http://www.drvsrs.com

About the Author

A trained ISO 9001:2000 Quality systems Consultant and Auditor, MIS Consultant and Socio-economic development acceleration specialist with expertise in Commonwealth Fund for Technical Cooperation (CFTC), London and Caribbean Development Bank (CDB – A World bank & UNDP setup), Barbados, West Indies. Author of over 60 publications in Management technique applications. Over 30 years experience in national and multinational organizations as a Head of Techno-commercial departments. Contributing author to Research papers in Economics (http://ideas.repec.org/e/psu50.html) and social Science Research Network (http://www.ssrn.com/author =360079). Expert in Economics at http://www.allexperts.com/expert.cgi?m=1&catID=2301&expID=74700
Website at and Book store at http://www.lulu.com/drvsrs . Academically a B.Sc (Physics), MBA., Ph.D., D.Litt.,

Williams Grove – Engineer Classes with #643

Railway Economy: An Exposition of the Advantages of Locomotion by Locomotive Carriages Instead of the Present System of Steam Tugs This book, “Railway Economy: An Exposition of the Advantages of Locomotion by Locomotive Carriages Instead of the Present System of Steam Tugs”, by Lewis Dunbar Brodie Gordon, is a replication. It has been restored by human beings, page by page, so that you may enjoy it in a form as close to the original as possible. This book was created using print-on-demand technology. Thank you for supporting …

Relative advantages of modern steam and electric locomotives, …

Railway Economy: An Exposition of the Advantages of Locomotion by Locomotive Carriages Instead of the Present System of Steam Tugs £6.77 …